Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author許修豪en_US
dc.contributor.authorShiou Haur Sheuen_US
dc.contributor.author鄭復平en_US
dc.contributor.authorFu-Ping Chengen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T02:19:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T02:19:54Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#NT870015048en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/63751-
dc.description.abstract混凝土承受高溫後會造成其抗壓強度很大的損失,進而影響結構物之安全。而高溫後混凝土若能給予適當的水分供給,會進行再水化作用使得部分強度恢復。 本研究擬就普通混凝土與高性能混凝土兩種材料,在加溫時承受不同目標溫度(200、400、600、800℃)、冷卻時以不同冷卻方式(自然冷卻、強制冷卻)、冷卻後再施予不同的再養護方式(空氣中養護、間歇性泡水養護、持續泡水養護)與不同再養護齡期(1、7、28、91天)下,對試體殘留強度之影響。探討不同冷卻再養護方式對混凝土承受高溫後殘餘強度及恢復狀況之影響。結果發現以間歇性泡水養護可得到最佳效果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe compressive strength of concrete was lost significantly at high temperature, and might affect the safety of the structure. But partial recovery in strength may occur by appropriate re-curing. This study is aimed at the investigation of the strength recovery of Normal Strength Concrete and High Performance Concrete after suffering elevated temperature with different cooling method and re-curing method. This study is devoted to investigate the effects of re-curing method. The major experimental parameters include cooling method (natural cooling, forced cooling), re-curing method (air curing, intermittent water curing, sustained water curing), and curing time (1, 7, 28, 91 days). Result shows that intermittent water curing can get the best recovery strength.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject冷卻zh_TW
dc.subject再養護zh_TW
dc.subject混凝土zh_TW
dc.subject殘餘強度zh_TW
dc.subject恢復zh_TW
dc.subjectcooling methoden_US
dc.subjectre-curing methoden_US
dc.subjectstrength recoveryen_US
dc.subjectconcreteen_US
dc.subjecttemperatureen_US
dc.title不同冷卻再養護方式對混凝土承受高溫後殘餘強度及恢復狀況之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffect of different cooling method and re-curing method on strength recovery of concrete suffering elevated temperatureen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis