完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author陳怡婷en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yi-Tingen_US
dc.contributor.author倪貴榮en_US
dc.contributor.author陳在方en_US
dc.contributor.authorNi, Kuei-Jungen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Tsai-fangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T02:33:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T02:33:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079838527en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/72008-
dc.description.abstractWTO Accession Protocol (AP), a legal instrument concluded between the WTO and new Member at the time of accession, has received more and more attention recently because it no longer functions as a confirmation of compliance with the existing WTO disciplines, it starts to contain Member-specific substantive obligations that deviate from the existing WTO rules. China’s AP and Russia’s AP are cases in point. When being found violating the obligations under the AP, acceding Members purport to invoke general exceptions under the GATT as a defense, claiming to pursue a non-trade policy objective. This defense stirs up lots of discussions. The most important and thorny issue in this matter is the applicability of GATT Art. XX in the AP. That is, whether GATT Art. XX can extend its application beyond the GATT and justify a violation in a separate agreement under the WTO, i.e. the AP. This is the focus of this thesis. The applicability matter has been addressed in two recent cases, China – Publications and Audiovisual Products and China – Raw Materials. WTO judiciary has made a major shift in its attitude, from avoiding this question to providing an answer. However, the reasoning and ruling in these two cases receive many critiques from the academia. This thesis will firstly provide background knowledge of the AP and GATT Art. XX with an aim to illuminate the relationship between these two. Then, a detailed account of China – Publications and Audiovisual Products and China – Raw Materials will be presented, along with some comments. Finally, this thesis proposes that AP obligations that are related to or built upon the obligations under the GATT should be treated like GATT obligations, including the recourse to GATT Art. XX defense.zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWTO Accession Protocol (AP), a legal instrument concluded between the WTO and new Member at the time of accession, has received more and more attention recently because it no longer functions as a confirmation of compliance with the existing WTO disciplines, it starts to contain Member-specific substantive obligations that deviate from the existing WTO rules. China’s AP and Russia’s AP are cases in point. When being found violating the obligations under the AP, acceding Members purport to invoke general exceptions under the GATT as a defense, claiming to pursue a non-trade policy objective. This defense stirs up lots of discussions. The most important and thorny issue in this matter is the applicability of GATT Art. XX in the AP. That is, whether GATT Art. XX can extend its application beyond the GATT and justify a violation in a separate agreement under the WTO, i.e. the AP. This is the focus of this thesis. The applicability matter has been addressed in two recent cases, China – Publications and Audiovisual Products and China – Raw Materials. WTO judiciary has made a major shift in its attitude, from avoiding this question to providing an answer. However, the reasoning and ruling in these two cases receive many critiques from the academia. This thesis will firstly provide background knowledge of the AP and GATT Art. XX with an aim to illuminate the relationship between these two. Then, a detailed account of China – Publications and Audiovisual Products and China – Raw Materials will be presented, along with some comments. Finally, this thesis proposes that AP obligations that are related to or built upon the obligations under the GATT should be treated like GATT obligations, including the recourse to GATT Art. XX defense.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGATT第二十條zh_TW
dc.subjectGATT一般例外條款zh_TW
dc.subject適用可能性zh_TW
dc.subject入會議定書zh_TW
dc.subject中國視聽服務案zh_TW
dc.subject中國原物料案zh_TW
dc.subjectGATT Art. XXen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Exceptions under the GATTen_US
dc.subjectApplicabilityen_US
dc.subjectAccession Protocolen_US
dc.subjectChina – Publications and Audiovisual Productsen_US
dc.subjectChina – Raw Materialsen_US
dc.titleGATT一般例外條款於WTO入會議定書之適用可能性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Applicability of GATT Art. XX in WTO Accession Protocolen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department科技法律研究所zh_TW
顯示於類別:畢業論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 852701.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。