标题: Strongback对同心斜撑构架受震行为影响
Effect of Strongback on the Seismic Behavior of Special Concentrically Braced Frame
作者: 唐尧
Tang,Yao
陈垂欣
陈诚直
Chen,Chui-Hsin
Chen,Cheng-Chih
土木工程系所
关键字: 同心斜撑构架;层间位移集中因子;静态非线性分析;动态非线性分析;Concentrically Braced Frame;drift concentration factor;nonlinear static analysis;nonlinear dynamic analysis
公开日期: 2013
摘要: 同心斜撑构架(Concentrically Braced Frame,CBF)系统为现代常用的结构系统。此构架型式缺点为当某一层楼斜撑构架中的斜撑发生降伏或挫屈,即会造成该层楼的侧向劲度与强度降低,楼层变形会集中于此层楼,即弱层(Soft Story)现象。造成该楼层严重破坏,可能使整体建筑无法修复而无法继续使用。本研究的主要目的即为以strongback改善CBF中的弱层现象,使结构物的层间变位均匀分布于各个楼层。
本研究为个案分析,研究方法为建立三层与十二层的SCBF构架,分别加入不同强度与劲度的strongback,再分别进行静态与动态的非线性行为分析,以观察短周期结构物与长周期结构物对加入不同强度劲度的strongback影响。研究变数为α(劲度变化因子)与β(强度变化因子),分析结果比较静态非线性行为DCF(Drift Concentration Factor)、动态非线性行为DCF、各层楼的迟滞回圈、层间最大变位、层间永久变位与楼层动态历时,并评估α(劲度变化因子)与β(强度变化因子)对结构物弱层改善的情形。
研究结果显示,就此个案为例,加入α与β数值较高的strongback可以降低结构物的DCF,并降低结构物的最大层间变位与最大永久变位,使各楼层的最大层间变位与最大永久变位均匀分布。但过低的α与β数值(α<0.0048,β<0.014)对结构物并无影响;过高的α与β数值(α>0.0144,β>0.042)对结构物影响非常小,因此本研究以符合经济效益与改善结构物弱层情形为前提,建议α=0.0096,β=0.028作为strongback设计之参考数值。
The objective of this study is to improve drift concentration in Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF) structures by adding strongback system. In convention CBF structures, the buckling of the braces leads to severe reduction in system strength and stiffness. Therefore soft story mechanisms followed by large permanent deformation are commonly observed in CBF structures. The storngback system using additional structural components along the height of the building to resist local deformation is able to improve the distribution of the drift.
Case studies investigate the effects of strength and stiffness of the strongback system on the behavior of three- and twelve-story CBF systems representing short- and long-period structures. The primary variables to be investigated are stiffness factor α (strongback stiffness/CBF stiffness) and strength factor β (strongback strength/CBF strength). We conducted nonlinear static and dynamic analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of α and β on structural demand parameters such as drift concentration factor (DCF), maximum drift ratio and permanent drift ratio. Analyses results show that strongback system with higher α and β will reduce DCF, maximum drift ratio and permanent drift ratio of CBF systems. Also, strongback systems with α<0.0048 and β<0.014 have only little effects on improving structural behavior. On the other hand, strongback systems with α>0.0144 and β>0.042 are noneconomic. The case studies suggested that α=0.0096 and β=0.028 accounting for both efficiency and economics can be used in the design of the selected CBF systems.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT070051208
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/74608
显示于类别:Thesis