民間參與歷史建築保存之可行性分析--以三峽老街為例

Abstract

自70年代以來，歷史建築的再利用已在西方世界蓬勃發展，早已取代50、60年代大拆大建的都市更新手法，反觀我國都市更新運動過程落後西方先進國家十餘年，卻同樣步上國外古蹟保存與都市更新互相衝突之後塵，而且目前仍走在國外保存演進的軌跡之上。回顧台灣的衝突事件中以三峽老街保存最具代表性，雖然近年來學者專家已引進先進國家對古蹟、歷史建築等文化資產的保存觀念，但由政府主導整修的觀念仍未改變，就算以促參法與民間共同整修歷史建築與古蹟，卻仍侷限於單一建築物個體。隨著各國政府財政日趨擷踞，民間資金不虞匱乏的條件下，民間參與公共建設已是世界經濟發展的重要趨勢，關於歷史街區的保存，國外早有民間參與之案例。 本文以三峽老街為個案研討，假設以OT方式由民間參與歷史街區經營，探討其可行性。本研究發現：1.在法律可行性與市場可行性上確實可行。2.在民意可行性上有待與居民溝通。3.在財務可行性依本研究之假設亦可行。 本研究提出建議與後續研究方向，期望能作為日後推動類似歷史街區保存的參考。

Since 1970, reuse of historic buildings has been extensively developed in the Western World and has replaced the urban renewal strategy of dismantling old buildings and setting up new buildings of the 50’s and 60's. In contrast, even though our country’s urban renewal process lags Western developed countries for more than ten years, like these countries, we face the same conflict between historical site preservation and urban renewal, and we currently follow the foot steps of how preservation evolved in these countries. Looking back at the conflicts Taiwan has had, the preservation of Sansia Old Street represents the best example. Although scholars and experts had introduced the idea used by advanced countries on preservation of cultural properties, such as historic sites and building, the idea of having the government carrying out renovation plan predominantly has not changed. In the cases where one were to proceed with the renovation of certain historic buildings or sites through collaboration between the government and private parties as regulated in “Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects”, the renovation is limited to single buildings. Whereas government of each country having tighter financial budget yet private parties having enough capital available, allowing private parties to involve in public construction has been one important trend in the economic development around the world. With regards to the preservation of historic neighborhood, there have long been cases of private party’s involvement in foreign countries. This article takes only the Sansia Old Street as a case to study and discuss the feasibility of hypothetical reuse of historic building involving private party’s operation through OT. The following is the conclusion of this discover: 1.It is workable on law and market. 2.Wether it is workable on public opinion, denpending on the discuss with residents. 3.According with the hypothesis, It is also workable on finance. It also makes propositions and after-study in hoping to become a reference of consideration in future plan on preservation of historic neighborhood.