標題: 品牌購併之研究-以TCL併Thomson彩電&Alcatel行動通訊部門、聯想電腦併IBM 個人電腦部門與明基併西門子手機部門為例
A Study of Brand Mergers-Cases of TCL-THOMSON TV& ALCATEL Cell Phone,LENOVO-IBM PC and BENQ-SIEMENS Cell Phone
作者: 張正賢
Cheng-Hsien Chang
朱博湧
Po-Young Chu
管理科學系所
關鍵字: 購併;風險;價值創造;品牌;個案研究;Merger & Acquisition;Risk;Value creation;Brand;Case study
公開日期: 2005
摘要: 本篇論文研究的目的主要在探討向來以代工製造起家的亞洲企業,在市場朝向國際化、全球化發展下,進行品牌併購以邁入全球市場時,所採行之策略對經營管理所產生之影響,並尋找影響購併之經營管理變數。 本研究採用文獻探討法與個案研究法,由企業經營變數出發,透過企業購併的動機與購併時所產生的風險與價值的文獻,藉以探討價值創造與購併風險,並進行綜合性的整理與評論。本研究選擇之對象為中國聯想集團購併美商IBM個人電腦部門與中國TCL集團購併購法商Thomson電器與Alcatel手機部門及明基電通購併德商SIEMENS手機部門,樣本研究期間為2003~2006年。 實証研究結果如下: (一)就財務方面而言:聯想的財務績效優於其他兩家公司。聯想完成購併後在2005年年度的股東權益報酬率仍有3%、EBITDA/營業額為3%、營業額成長率高達359%;同一年度TCL集團的股東報酬權益則下降至-7%、EBITDA/營業額為2%、營業額成長率28%;同一年度明基集團的股東報酬權益則下降至-13%、EBITDA/營業額為-1%、營業額成長率僅有1%。 (二)就購併動機因子異同點而言:這三個個案在購併動機因子相同點可歸納為下列幾點:1.規模經濟、2.垂直整合的利益、3.互補性的資源、4.開拓新市場、5.商譽(品牌)的取得、6.提高研發能力、7.強化專利佈局、8.提高國際形象;相異點歸納如下列幾點:1.購併方式、2.解決營運困境、3.突破貿易或非貿易障礙、4.生產製造優勢、5.多角化經營。
The thesis is to investigate the strategies of Asian enterprises thriving from manufacturing growth to enter the global market via mergers and acquisitions (M&A). As the market development evolved towards internationalization and globalization it resulted in globol operation management as well as booming M&A activities. This thesis adopted document research and case study. There are three case studies in this thesis-IBM PC M&A by Lenovo, and Thomson TV & Alcatel cell phone M&A by TCL and Siemens cell phone M&A by BenQ. Research period is from 2003 to 2006. Results are concluded as follow: (1)Financial performance:financial performance of Lenovo Group is better than that of the other two cases. After Lenovo completing M&A, return on equity in 2005 remained 3%; EBITDA/ the business volume, 3%; the growth rate in the business volume, high up to 359%. In the same year, return on equity of TCL group dropped to -7%; EBITDA/ the business volume, 2%; the growth rate in the business volume, 28%. Moreover, return on equity of BenQ group dropped to -13%; EBITDA/ the business volume, -1%; the growth rate in the business volume,1%. (2)Similarities and dissimilarities of motivations of M&A:from there three cases of M&A, we concluded the following similarities:1. the economical scale 2. the gain in vertical mergers 3. complementary resource 4. new market exploration 5. goodwill(brand) acquirement 6. enhancement of R&D capability 7. consolidation of patent arrangements 8. improvement of international image;dissimilarities were:1. method of M&A 2. Solving difficulties in operations 3. breakthrough of trade or non-trade barriers 4. advantages of production 5. diversifications.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT009331520
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/79388
顯示於類別:畢業論文