Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jiann Liangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Huan Nengen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Gwo-Hshiungen_US
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Ruey Hueien_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:10:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:10:44Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-0255en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/8208-
dc.description.abstractVendor selection is an evaluation process that is based on many criteria that uses inaccurate or uncertain data. But while the criteria are often numerous and the relationships between higher-level criteria and lower-level sub-criteria are complex, most conventional decision models cannot help us clarify the interrelationships among the sub-criteria. Our proposed integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method addresses this issue within the context of the vendor selection problem. First. we use triangular fuzzy numbers to express the subjective preferences of evaluators. Second. we use interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to map out the relationships among the sub-criteria. Third, we use the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method to compute the relative weights for each criterion, and we use non-additive fuzzy integral to obtain the fuzzy synthetic performance of each common criterion. Fourth, the best vendor is determined according to the overall aggregating score of each vendor using the fuzzy weights with fuzzy synthetic Utilities. Fifth, we use an empirical example to show that our proposed method is preferred to the traditional method. especially when the sub-criteria are interdependent. Finally, our results provide valuable suggestions to vendors on how to improve each SUb-criterion so that they can bridge the gap between actual and aspired performance values in the future. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectvendor selectionen_US
dc.subjectmultiple criteria decision making (MCDM)en_US
dc.subjectindependenceen_US
dc.subjectinterdependenceen_US
dc.subjectnon-additive fuzzy integralen_US
dc.titleVendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationshipsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.003en_US
dc.identifier.journalINFORMATION SCIENCESen_US
dc.citation.volume178en_US
dc.citation.issue21en_US
dc.citation.spage4166en_US
dc.citation.epage4183en_US
dc.contributor.department科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Management of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000259485900013-
dc.citation.woscount62-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000259485900013.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.