完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLin, I-Kaien_US
dc.contributor.authorBai, Hsunlingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Cheng-Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Bi-Junen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:12:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:12:33Z-
dc.date.issued2008-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0149-6395en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496390701870580en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/9643-
dc.description.abstractThe performances of inorganic airborne molecular contaminants (AMCs) via silica gel tubes, impingers, and diffusion denuder sampler (DDS) were compared in a cleanroom. The results showed silica gel tubes were not applicable for cleanroom sampling due to high blanks. While with optimal sampling conditions both impingers and DDS have much better performances, of which DDS has the lowest detection limits of the method for HF, HCl, HNO2, HNO3, SO2, and NH3 gases to be 0.15, 0.11, 0.13, 0.03, 0.07, and 0.42 mu g/m(3), respectively. Results indicated no significant difference for the HF and SO42- concentrations made by the DDS and impingers.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectairborne molecular contamination (AMC)en_US
dc.subjectcleanroomen_US
dc.subjectmicro-contaminationen_US
dc.subjectsemiconductor deviceen_US
dc.subjectdiffusion denuder sampler (DDS)en_US
dc.subjectimpinger air sampleren_US
dc.titleComparison of cleanroom samplers for inorganic airborne molecular contaminantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01496390701870580en_US
dc.identifier.journalSEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume43en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage842en_US
dc.citation.epage861en_US
dc.contributor.department環境工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000254394700009-
dc.citation.woscount5-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000254394700009.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。