完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorOpricovic, Serafimen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Gwo-Hshiungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:14:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:14:15Z-
dc.date.issued2007-04-16en_US
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/10896-
dc.description.abstractThe VIKOR method was developed to solve MCDM problems with conflicting and noncommensurable (different units) criteria, assuming that compromising is acceptable for conflict resolution, the decision maker wants a solution that is the closest to the ideal, and the alternatives are evaluated according to all established criteria. This method focuses on ranking and selecting from a set of alternatives in the presence of conflicting criteria, and on proposing compromise solution (one or more). The VIKOR method is extended with a stability analysis determining the weight stability intervals and with trade-offs analysis. The extended VIKOR method is compared with three multicriteria decision making methods: TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE. A numerical example illustrates an application of the VIKOR method, and the results by all four considered methods are compared. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectmultiple criteria analysisen_US
dc.subjectcompromiseen_US
dc.subjectextended VIKOR methoden_US
dc.titleExtended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020en_US
dc.identifier.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume178en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage514en_US
dc.citation.epage529en_US
dc.contributor.department科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Management of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000242726800015-
dc.citation.woscount200-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000242726800015.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。