Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ming-Chungen_US
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jin-Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Heng-Chuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T05:59:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T05:59:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1230-1485en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/81065en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/147900-
dc.description.abstractEnergy consumption growth and greenhouse effect deterioration have caused an argument about who should lead the global climate change duty between industrialized and emerging countries. This study investigates the resource efficiency differences between nations in the Group of Seven (G7) and in an association of 5 major emerging economic bodies, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). This study applies the data envelopment analysis approach to finding the BRICS group's advantages and pointing out what the G7 group should pay attention to in the future. The conclusion shows that the BRICS group has better technical efficiency improvement than the G7 group, and that the BRICS group is moving toward high energy efficiency. Findings show that the G7 suffers from technical deterioration, with some G7 members also presenting the phenomenon of high emissions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectresource efficiencyen_US
dc.subjecttotal-factor productivity changeen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental Kuznets curve (EKC)en_US
dc.titleResource Efficiency and Productivity Changes in the G7 and BRICS Nationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15244/pjoes/81065en_US
dc.identifier.journalPOLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIESen_US
dc.citation.volume27en_US
dc.citation.spage2463en_US
dc.citation.epage2474en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000439622000006en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles