Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author林克明zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T07:48:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-29T07:48:21Z-
dc.date.issued2008-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1816-0514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6752/jcs.200803_(6).0005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/157508-
dc.description.abstract意像是否等同於影像?如果不同,那麼相對於影像的意像又是什麼?從拉岡的心理分析出發,本文試圖釐清影像和意像的關係。所得的結果將與巴特的電影論相互辯證,以試圖藉此理解在電影場域裡觀影者的意像為何。本文最後將導入拉岡的風格論,嘗試了解作者如何透過影像影響電影意像的構成。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIs there any difference between image and imago? If the answer is ”yes”, what is imago compared with image? By means of Lacanian psychoanalysis, this paper seeks to clarify the term of imago and its relationship to image. The result will be examined by means of Barthes's film theory in order to explore what the imago in relation to film image is. Finally, a Lacanian approach of understanding style is applied to realize how the author (filmmaker), if he/she can, intervenes in the formation of the film imago.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher國立陽明交通大學出版社zh_TW
dc.publisherNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Pressen_US
dc.subject影像zh_TW
dc.subject意像zh_TW
dc.subject鏡像zh_TW
dc.subject敞義zh_TW
dc.subject風格zh_TW
dc.subjectimageen_US
dc.subjectimagoen_US
dc.subjectmirror imageen_US
dc.subjectobtuse meaningen_US
dc.subjectstyleen_US
dc.title影像與意像:拉岡的影像論與巴特的電影論zh_TW
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6752/jcs.200803_(6).0005en_US
dc.identifier.journal文化研究zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalRouter: A Journal of Cultural Studiesen_US
dc.citation.issue6en_US
dc.citation.spage81en_US
dc.citation.epage106en_US
Appears in Collections:Router: A Journal of Cultural Studies


Files in This Item:

  1. Router-2008-6-6.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.