完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 林克明 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-29T07:48:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-29T07:48:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008-03-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1816-0514 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.6752/jcs.200803_(6).0005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/157508 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 意像是否等同於影像?如果不同,那麼相對於影像的意像又是什麼?從拉岡的心理分析出發,本文試圖釐清影像和意像的關係。所得的結果將與巴特的電影論相互辯證,以試圖藉此理解在電影場域裡觀影者的意像為何。本文最後將導入拉岡的風格論,嘗試了解作者如何透過影像影響電影意像的構成。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Is there any difference between image and imago? If the answer is ”yes”, what is imago compared with image? By means of Lacanian psychoanalysis, this paper seeks to clarify the term of imago and its relationship to image. The result will be examined by means of Barthes's film theory in order to explore what the imago in relation to film image is. Finally, a Lacanian approach of understanding style is applied to realize how the author (filmmaker), if he/she can, intervenes in the formation of the film imago. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | en_US |
dc.publisher | 國立陽明交通大學出版社 | zh_TW |
dc.publisher | National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Press | en_US |
dc.subject | 影像 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 意像 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 鏡像 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 敞義 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 風格 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | image | en_US |
dc.subject | imago | en_US |
dc.subject | mirror image | en_US |
dc.subject | obtuse meaning | en_US |
dc.subject | style | en_US |
dc.title | 影像與意像:拉岡的影像論與巴特的電影論 | zh_TW |
dc.type | Campus Publications | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6752/jcs.200803_(6).0005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | 文化研究 | zh_TW |
dc.identifier.journal | Router: A Journal of Cultural Studies | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 81 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 106 | en_US |
顯示於類別: | 文化研究 |