完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yan-Shuen_US
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jin-Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorXia, Peng-Chiaoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:29:41Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:29:41Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1463-6786en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02271.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/21314-
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the patent licensing decision when firms can endogenously choose their locations. If the insider patentee is the location leader, the royalty is not necessarily the best method of licensing. No licensing can be the best method for an insider patentee with a sufficiently high degree of innovation, but fixed-fee is always the worst. However, if the non-innovating firm is the location leader, the royalty licensing is always the best method; moreover, the fixed-fee licensing (no licensing) is the second best method if the degree of innovation is relatively small (sufficiently large).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleLOCATION CHOICE AND PATENT LICENSINGen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02271.xen_US
dc.identifier.journalMANCHESTER SCHOOLen_US
dc.citation.volume81en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage121en_US
dc.citation.epage142en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000315053800001-
dc.citation.woscount1-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000315053800001.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。