标题: Effects of Argument Scaffolding and Source Credibility on Science Text Comprehension
作者: Lin, Tzu-Jung
Horng, Ruey-Yun
Anderson, Richard C.
交大名義發表
National Chiao Tung University
关键字: argumentation;argument schema;source credibility;text comprehension
公开日期: 3-四月-2014
摘要: This study investigated the effects of argument scaffolding and source credibility on science text comprehension. Eighty-seven college students were randomly assigned to an argument scaffolding activity, or no scaffolding, and read 2 science texts, attributed to a high- or a low-credibility source. The argument-scaffolding group recalled less text-based information but generated more knowledge-based inferences than did the no-scaffolding group. High source credibility enhanced readers' text-based recall but had little effect on knowledge-based inferences or situation models. Overall, results suggest that argumentation facilitates deeper text comprehension and better argument understanding, while at the same time reducing the effect of source credibility on text processing.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.769423
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/23891
ISSN: 0022-0973
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2013.769423
期刊: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION
Volume: 82
Issue: 2
起始页: 264
结束页: 282
显示于类别:Articles


文件中的档案:

  1. 000330696100007.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.