成年觀護個案酒駕風險知覺、拒酒自我效能與酒後駕車行為之關聯性

Abstract

本研究的目的在於瞭解成年觀護個案拒酒自我效能與酒駕風險知覺的情形，並探討此兩者對酒後駕車行為的影響。本研究以「酒駕風險知覺問卷」與「拒酒自我效能問卷」為測量工具，採便利取樣方式，以北、中、南、東部地區共 16 個地檢署之成年觀護個案為樣本，進行施測，共得1308位有效樣本，並以Pearson 積差相關、多元迴歸分析、單變項變異數分析等統計方法進行分析，以考驗假設，其研究結果分述如下：1.、酒駕風險知覺、拒酒自我效能與酒後駕車次數有顯著相關。其中「社交壓力」拒酒自我效能與酒後駕車次數的相關程度最高。2.酒駕風險知覺、拒酒自我效能對酒後駕車次數有顯著預測力。其中以「社交壓力」拒酒自我效能最具預測力，其次是「安全抵達」酒駕風險知覺，再其次是「被取締」酒駕風險知覺。3.不同酒駕被移送法辦次數者，在酒駕風險知覺、拒酒自我效能及酒後駕車次數上有顯著差異。有二次酒駕被移送法辦經驗者，其「安全抵達」與「被取締」風險知覺均比無被移送經歷者及有一次被移送者來得高；但「社交壓力」、「紓解情緒」與「情境因素」等拒酒自我效能，均比無被移送經歷者及有一次被移送者來得低。 根據以上研究發現，本研究提出進一步的討論，並提供輔導應用上之建議及未來之研究方向。

The purpose of the study were to investigate the drinking refusal self-efficacy and risk perception of drunk driving in adult probation cases, and to explore whether the these two factors could be effectively predicted the score of drunken driving behaviors. Using Risk Perception of Drunk Driving Questionnaire and Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire-revised (DRSEQ-R) as research tools, with convenience sampling method, this research was carried out on 1308 adult probation cases in 16 district prosecutor offices around northern, middle, southern, and eastern Taiwan. The statistical methods used to analyze the data were Pearson’s product-moment correlation, multiple regression analysis, and one-way ANOVA. The main findings were as follows：1. The drinking refusal self-efficacy, risk perception of drunk driving, and the frequency of drunk driving were significantly correlated. 2. Risk Perception of Drunk Driving and DRSEQ-R have significantly predictive power over the frequency of drunk driving. The “social pressure” drinking refusal self-efficacy, “safe arrival” and “being stopped” in risk perception of drunk driving, could effectively predicted the frequency of drunk driving. 3. There were significant differences among respective caught drunken driver in risk perception of drunk driving, the drinking refusal self-efficacy, and the frequency of drunk driving. Individuals whom were brought to justice with more than twice experience of drunken driving, their “safe arrival” and “being stopped ”risk perceptions were both higher than those who were only caught once. However, their drinking refusal self-efficacy were lower than individuals who have never been caught, or just once. Based on the research findings stated above, the researcher proposed further discussions for the use in the future counseling applications and directions of subsequent researches.