能源服務業發展政策與策略分析

Abstract

本研究之主要架構以ESCO政策分析模式為基礎，建構能源服務業( ESCO )產業之競爭策略，以政策目標與能源服務產業( ESCO )策略目標為區隔變數。透過此一分析區隔出能源服務業( ESCO )產業之不同目標定位，並利用產業創新需求要素分析模式及產業專家之意見調查，分析歸納出不同目標下，發展能源服務業( ESCO )產業的關鍵成功要素，提出各國能源服務業( ESCO )未來發展的可能經營策略。 本研究根據產業創新需求要素與政策類型的分析結果得到，美國能源政策是以政治發展與經濟發展為主軸，而ESCO產業發展策略則重視於節約能源、能源資源整合與管理、協助能源產業發展為主，優先加強的政策工具有：科學與技術開發、教育與訓練、政策性措施、公營事業、法規與管制、資訊服務、貿易管制、海外機構、公共服務、財務金融；歐盟能源政策是以政治發展、科技發展與社會發展為主軸，而ESCO產業發展策略則重視於節約能源，優先加強的政策工具有：政策性措施、公營事業、科學與技術開發、法規與管制、資訊服務、貿易管制、海外機構、教育與訓練、財務金融；日本的能源政策重點在於政治發展、經濟發展、科技發展與社會發展為主，而ESCO產業發展策略則重視於節約能源與協助能源產業發展，優先加強的政策工具有：政策性措施、公營事業、科學與技術開發、教育與訓練、法規與管制、資訊服務、貿易管制、海外機構、公共服務、財務金融；臺灣的能源政策是以政治發展、經濟發展、與社會發展為主，而ESCO產業發展策略則重視於節約能源、能源資源整合與管理、協助能源產業發展，優先加強的政策工具有：科學與技術開發、教育與訓練、政策性措施、公營事業、法規與管制、資訊服務、貿易管制、海外機構、公共服務、財務金融等方面。

This thesis reports on a strategic analysis of the development of Energy Service Companies. A Policy model is used to assess the strategic positioning entailing a 2-dimensional analysis, containing ESCO industry’s strategy objective (vertical axis) and policy objective (horizontal).By this way, we could find in different segmentation there will have different Industrial Innovation Requirements. Finally, we could give different strategies for different countries. Evaluating the Industrial Innovation Requirements and Policy Tools leads to a conclusion that for America the most critical categories of policy instruments are science and technology development, education and training, policy measures, public utilities, regulation and control, information services, trade controls, foreign institutions, public services, finance. For Europe the most critical categories of policy instruments are policy measures, public enterprises, science and technology development, regulation and control, information services, trade controls, foreign agencies, education and training, finance. For Japan the most critical categories of policy instruments are policy measures, public enterprises, science and technology development, education and training, regulation and control, information services, trade controls, foreign institutions, public services, Finance. For Taiwan the most critical categories of policy instruments are science and technology development, education and training, policy measures, public utilities, regulation and control, information services, trade controls, foreign institutions, public services, finance. The corresponding policy instruments in support of developing IIRs are provided in the conclusion of this thesis.