兩岸太陽光電產業政策之比較分析

Abstract

本研究分析兩岸太陽光電之產業創新系統、政策工具及產業關鍵成功因素之關連性，並與實際政府政策比較，以提供兩岸太陽光電發展與產業政策之建議。

研究方法主要以Porter競爭策略矩陣、企業價值鏈與Hope與Hope的「產業價值鏈策略群組分析模式」為太陽光電廠商作策略定位，並結合「關鍵成功因素」之觀念，分析太陽光電產業發展關鍵成功因素之間的關連性。在產業政策工具定義方面，以Rothwell and Zegveld 的理論 為基礎，歸納整理出兩岸的太陽光電政策工具。

，經由兩岸的政策工具比較發現，現行政策中較欠缺海外機構的聯絡設置及資訊服務，幫助建立產業訊息的流通管道。大陸推行具體政策可朝科學與技術開發、教育與訓練、租稅優惠、資訊服務和貿易管制等方向實施。而台灣未來期望可朝科學與技術開發、教育訓練、政策性措施、貿易管制、以及資訊服務等方向制定政策。

This study analyzes photovoltaic (PV) industry across the Taiwan strait on correlation between industrial innovation system, policy tools and key successful factor, then compare with actual government policy and finally offer conclusion as reference point for PV industry and policy development across the strait.

Using Porter’s competitive strategy model, industrial supply chain and Hope & Hope industrial value chain strategic group analysis model to position PV manufacturers, also combines the key successful factors (KSFs) concept to figure out PV industry development key successful factors. On industrial policy instruments definition, using Rothwell and Zegveld model to sort the PV policies across the strait. The industry’s KSFs use a series of expert interviews. These new KSFs identified are assumed to the targeted directions for future developments for firms across the strait.

Results show that, Taiwan and China’s current policies are more towards financial, legal regulation and political regulation. The new innovation policies demanded by Taiwan and China include scientific & technical, education, information and commercial regulation.