标题: 软砂岩微观组构与异向性渗透性质探讨
A Study on the Microstructure and Anisotropic
作者: 李贤淦
Shyang-Gan Lee
潘以文
土木工程学系
关键字: 异向性;微观组构;渗透性质;Microstructure;Anisotropic;Permeability
公开日期: 1999
摘要: 软弱岩石的透水系数不但与试体饱和度、颗粒粒径分布、孔隙大小、泥质含量及胶结物种类等因素有关,且深受渗流方向之影响。如欲以传统之定水头或变水头渗透实验方法决定材料不同方向之渗透性常有其困难。为求正确决定材料渗透性,本研究尝试研发一试体准备方法程序来制作恰当试体,藉而能够求得异向性岩石的渗透性质。由苗栗天花湖及台中大坑分别取回灰色粉砂岩及黄色砂岩之岩样,进行一系列室内定流量三轴透水试验。所求得的渗透系数整理如下:苗栗天花湖灰色粉砂岩平行层面之取样介于2.82×10-6~9.85×10-6cm/s,垂直层面之取样介于9.71×10-7~1.65×10-6cm/s;台中大坑黄色砂岩方向P取样介于7.12×10-5~9.14×10-5cm/s,方向V取样介于4.56×10-5~6.27×10-5cm/s。
此外,本研究对软弱砂岩施以渗流弱化模拟,再以微观方式观察不同方向取样试体之组构变化,分析岩石颗粒与胶结物的改变情形,探讨渗流及不同方向取样对微组构的影响。本研究利用三轴透水仪器模拟渗流作用,再观察其渗流前后微组构的变化,发现岩石的平面孔隙率在渗流后比渗流前增大了1~3%。推测主要是细颗粒与填充物之间会有孔隙局部增大的情形,可能是渗流水经过时先溶解掉具有胶结性的黏土矿物,使细颗粒间的凝聚力降低,造成崩解分离。而不同方向取样的试体,其平面孔隙率约相差2~4%。
The permeability of soft rock depends on several factors, including saturation, grain characteristics, pores, and cementation, of the material. In this study, a method of specimen preparation was designed to investigate the anisotropic permeability of soft rock. A series of constant-flow permeability tests on samples of soft sandstone from Tian-Hua Lake, Miaoli (denoted THL) and from Ta-kang, Taichung (denoted TK) were carried out. For THL sandstone, the permeability along bedding direction lies within 2.82 ×10-6~9.85 ×10-6cm/s, while the permeability perpendicular to bedding direction lies within 9.71 ×10-7~1.65 ×10-6 cm/s. For TK sandstone, the permeability along two mutually perpendicular directions (denoted directions P and V, respectively) were determined and compared: the permeability along the P direction lies within 7.12 ×10-5~9.14 ×10-5cm/s, while the permeability along the V direction lies within 4.56 ×10-5~6.27 ×10-5cm/s.
This study also attempts to investigate the microstructure change of soft sandstone after the degradation due to seepage. By comparing the microstructures of samples before and after seepage, it was observed that the void in sandstone increases significantly after degradation. On the basis of microscopic observation, the possible cause is likely due to the void increase near the grain-matrix interface in the material and/or the dissolution of the cementation/matrix. The void ratio estimated from sections prepared along two mutually perpendicular directions may differ about 2~4%.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#NT880015034
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/65132
显示于类别:Thesis