Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author江穎俊en_US
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Ying-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.author徐作聖en_US
dc.contributor.authorShyu, Joseph Z.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T02:33:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T02:33:33Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT070063507en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/71848-
dc.description.abstract本研究應用創新密集服務分析模式架構,從內部服務價值活動與外部資源涵量為主體分析構面,來對農業檢測檢驗與驗證服務廠商之目前與未來策略定位進行評量分析。其中內部服務價值活動分析包含服務設計、測試認證、市場行銷、配銷活動、售後服務、支援活動等六大類核心關鍵因素的控制能力;而外部資源則強調互補資源、研究發展、產品設計、產品製造、服務提供、市場行銷、其他客戶等七大類外部資源關鍵因素的掌握程度,最後輔以四種客製化程度與五種創新方式所組成成的4X5 矩陣對兩大主體的差異分析,以了解未來(5~10年)的策略發展趨勢。IIS 的統計數據來源為產業專家的訪談及問卷結果。 研究結果顯示,由專家問卷與訪談所歸納的農業檢測檢驗與驗證服務產業“現在”策略定位為「製程創新(P2)/一般型服務(G)」而未來的策略定位為「產品創新(P1)/選擇服務(S)」與「市場創新(M)/選擇服務(S)」,但是經IIS的分析後發現,此二個未來定位點的值大於μS -σS =1.079,表示這個策略未來定位的可行性具有相當的難度,即表示此策略定位基本上是屬於可修正之策略定位;在不修正策略定位的情形下,建議未來廠商可考慮投入較多資源於服務價值活動與外部資源之補強建構上,或重新尋找如「組織創新(O)/特定服務(R) 」或「組織創新(O)/一般服務(G) 」等新的策略定位點,較易完成策略與營運模式之轉型。為達成這二個可行的策略定位點,必須強化設計、測試認證、行銷、配銷、售後服務、支援活動等六個內部關鍵成功要素與服務、市場等二個外部關鍵成功要素。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBy applying an intergrated model of Innovation Intensive Service (IIS), this thesis analyze the current and future strategic positionings of certification vendors for agricultural testing, inspection and service from the aspect of ingernal value activities and externalities. The internal value activities comprise of 6 key factors including Service Design, Validation of Testing, Marketing, Delivery, After Service and Supporting Activities, while the Externalities consist of 7 key factors including Complementary Assets Supplier, R&D/Science, Technology, Production, Servicing, Market and Other Users. Through a 4X5 matrix which encompasses four service approaches and five innovation modes, we elucidated the development trend of future (5-10 years) strategic positioning in this industry. The IIS stastistcs (assessment data) is derived from the data collected through interview with industry experts and questionnaires. The results showed that the PRESENT strategic positioning is focusing at “Process Innovation (P2)/General Service (G)” and FUTURE at “Product Innovation (P1)/Selective Service (S)” and “Market Innovation (M)/Selective Service (S)”. However, the IIS analysis revealed that both FUTURE strategic positionings as mentioned above are not so feasible as the total score of internal value activities and externalities is greater than μS -σS =1.079. The study suggested agricultural tesing, inspection and certification vendors to invest more resources either to strengthen internal value activities and externalities, or reposition at “Organizational Innovation (O)/Restrictive service (R)” and “Organizational Innovation (O)/General service (G)” as strategies. To achieve these new strategic positionings, the service provider is recommended to strengthen 6 factors (Service Design, Validation of Testing, Marketing, Delivery, After Service and Supporting Activities) of Internal value activities and 2 factors (Servicing and Market) of externalities.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject農業zh_TW
dc.subject檢測zh_TW
dc.subject檢驗zh_TW
dc.subject驗證zh_TW
dc.subject創新密集服務分析模式zh_TW
dc.subject服務價值活動zh_TW
dc.subject外部資源zh_TW
dc.subject知識密集服務zh_TW
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectTestingen_US
dc.subjectInspectionen_US
dc.subjectCertificationen_US
dc.subjectInnovation Intensive Servicesen_US
dc.subjectIISen_US
dc.subjectValue Activitiesen_US
dc.subjectExternalitiesen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Intensive Business Servicesen_US
dc.subjectKIBSen_US
dc.title作物農產品驗證服務策略zh_TW
dc.titleA Service Strategy for Agricultural Products Certificationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department管理學院科技管理學程zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis


Files in This Item:

  1. 350701.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.