完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author陳南成en_US
dc.contributor.authorNan-Cheng Chenen_US
dc.contributor.author方永壽en_US
dc.contributor.authorYung-Show Fangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T02:35:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T02:35:26Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT009216552en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/72602-
dc.description.abstract本論文探討鄰近垂直岩石界面對靜止土壓力之影響。在實驗中,本研究以氣乾之渥太華砂作為回填土,回填土高1.5 公尺。量測於鬆砂(Dr = 35%)與緊砂(Dr = 72%)狀態下的側向土壓力值。本研究利用國立交通大學模型擋土牆設備來探討不同擋土牆與界面板間的距離d對土壓力造成的影響。為了模擬堅硬岩石界面,本研究設計並建造一塊表面鋪上防滑材料的界面板,以及其支撐系統。牆與界面板間的距離d有1500、1100、900、700、500、400、300、200、100與50 公厘十種。根據實驗結果,獲得以下各項結論: 1. 鬆砂狀態下作用於牆上之側向土壓力σh 隨著牆與界面板之間的距離減少而減少。Jaky的理論解可視為鄰近垂直岩石界面土壓力分佈的極限值。 2. 擋土牆與界面板之間的距離d很短的時候(d □ 300 mm),鬆砂狀態下量測到的土壓力值比Rankine主動土壓力小而且土壓力不再隨深度增加而變化。 3. Janssen理論提供一套可以估計側向土壓力係數與預估牆底傾覆力矩的方法。 4. 夯實後的回填土頂部所量測到的土壓力值,與Rankine理論所估計的被動土壓力很接近。 5. 夯實後的側向土壓力值隨著牆與界面板間的距離d縮小而減少。擋土結構鄰近垂直岩石界面下,無適當理論可以估計作用在牆上的側向土壓力,因為這些理論都沒考慮到夯實效應。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies earth pressure at-rest near a vertical rock face. Dry Ottawa sand was used as backfill material. Horizontal earth pressures in loose (Dr = 35%) and compacted (Dr = 72%) soil mass were measured. The height of backfill is 1.5 m. The instrumented model retaining-wall at National Chiao Tung University was used to investigate the variation of earth pressure with different spacing d between model wall and interface plate. To simulate a vertical hard rock face, an interface plate covered with Safety-Walk (anti-slip material) and its supporting system were designed and constructed. The spacings between the wall and interface used are 1500, 1100, 900, 700, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100, and 50 mm. Based on the experiment results, the following conclusions are made. 1. The horizontal earth pressure σh for loose sand decreases with decreasing spacing d. Jaky’s solution can be considered as the upper bound for estimating earth pressure near a vertical rock face. 2. When the spacing d is very small (d □ 300 mm), the measured earth pressure σh is even lower than Rankine’s active pressure and appears not to change with depth. 3. Janssen’s method provides the best estimation for Ko,h coefficient under different wall-rock face spacing d. As for the factor of safety against overturning, Janssen’s prediction is the best method to estimate the overturning moment (Mo) about the wall base. 4. The lateral stress measured near the top is almost identical to the passive earth pressure estimated with Rankine theory. 5. The pressure coefficient Ko,h decreases with the decreasing of spacing d. None of the theories provide a good estimate of σh acting on a retaining structure with compacted backfill. Because these theoretical equations did not consider the effects of compaction.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subject鄰近zh_TW
dc.subject垂直zh_TW
dc.subject岩石界面zh_TW
dc.subject靜止zh_TW
dc.subject土壓力zh_TW
dc.subjectnearen_US
dc.subjectverticalen_US
dc.subjectrock faceen_US
dc.subjectat-resten_US
dc.subjectearth pressureen_US
dc.title鄰近垂直岩石界面對靜止土壓力之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEarth Pressure at-Rest near A Vertical Rock Faceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
顯示於類別:畢業論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 655201.pdf
  2. 655202.pdf
  3. 655203.pdf
  4. 655204.pdf
  5. 655205.pdf
  6. 655206.pdf
  7. 655207.pdf
  8. 655208.pdf
  9. 655209.pdf
  10. 655210.pdf
  11. 655211.pdf
  12. 655212.pdf
  13. 655213.pdf
  14. 655214.pdf
  15. 655215.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。