台灣IC設計服務產業之產業創新系統與創新政策研究

Abstract

本研究係結合創新密集服務平台與產業創新系統之觀念，建構一適用於創新密集服務業之產業創新系統與政策分析模式；進而以IC設計服務產業為實證研究對象，以驗證此模式之可行性。 本研究共分兩大層級，產業層級部分，此模式就產業環境與技術系統之八大構面得出產業創新系統需求要素，以此進行創新密集服務平台運作時之產業創新系統建構。接著，在國家層級方面，利用產業層級研究結果與十二項政策工具(包括供給面、環境面、需求面)之連結，探討產業創新系統與政策工具的關聯性；並藉專家問卷得出台灣發展IC設計服務產業所需之政策工具比重，最後經由專家訪談得到產業發展所需之政策實施細項。 產業層級之實證結果顯示，台灣IC設計服務產業目前所需之產業創新系統需求為產業環境構面之生產要素與技術系統構面之技術接收能力、網路連接性、多元化創新機制；未來則需強化產業創新系統中產業環境構面之企業策略、結構與競爭程度以及技術系統構面之產業網路連接性。 國家層級之實證結果則顯示，目前台灣IC設計服務產業最需之政策工具分別為供給面的「科學與技術發展」、「教育與訓練」、「資訊服務」及環境面的「政策性策略」。本研究建議主管機關與相關單位將產業資源優先發展於上述關鍵構面，期以最有效率的方式提升台灣IC設計服務產業競爭力。

This study provides an integrated model of innovation intensive services (IIS) and industrial innovation systems, which include both industry-level and national-level approaches to depict the future suggestion for applying policy instruments. A case study of Taiwan’s IC design service industry is used in this research to demonstrate the validity of this analytical model. The model respectively dissects four influential factors of industrial environments and technological systems at the industry-level analysis to verify the requirements of industrial innovation system, thereby constructing an industry-level analytical framework for developing IIS industry. Next, the result of national-level analysis will be obtained by the correlation between three levels of policy instruments (including supply, demand, and environmental side policies) and the above-mentioned requirements of industrial environments and technological systems in terms of the perspective of IIS approach. Results of case study in Taiwan’s IC design service industry reveal that the current critical factors of industrial innovation system in industry level include factor conditions, receiver competence, connectivity, and variety creation mechanism. In addition, the requirements of industrial innovation systems, including firm strategy, structure, rivalry and connectivity, could be emphasized for the future development of IC design service industry. The research also indicates that some policy instruments in national-level are essential for Taiwan’s IC design service industry such as scientific and technical investment, political measures, education and training, legal and regulation, and information. This research suggests that our government and related institutions should put more resources into the above mentioned policy instruments to enhance the competitiveness of Taiwan’s IC design services.