完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Chou-Kangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoe, Sheng-Wuuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chieh-Pengen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Tien-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYen, Pi-Hsiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:53:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:53:28Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1478-3363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1189823en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/144726-
dc.description.abstractThis research develops a model based on the transaction cost theory and resource allocation theory to predict how politics (i.e. autocracy and opportunism) affect team performance in technology industries. Directly related to resource adequacy, team performance is associated with top management autocracy and peer teams' opportunism indirectly via the mediation of collective affective commitment. The relationships between collective affective commitment and team performance and between resource adequacy and team performance are moderated by top management autocracy and peer teams' opportunism, respectively. Empirical testing of this model, by investigating personnel of work teams in high-tech firms, explores changes in politics in technology industries. Lastly, this study provides managerial implications and research limitations based on its empirical findings.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectteam performanceen_US
dc.subjectcollective affective commitmenten_US
dc.subjectautocracyen_US
dc.subjectopportunismen_US
dc.titleBeing an excellent team: understanding how politics influence team performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14783363.2016.1189823en_US
dc.identifier.journalTOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCEen_US
dc.citation.volume29en_US
dc.citation.spage365en_US
dc.citation.epage386en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000428309100007en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文