Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author陳建彰zh_TW
dc.contributor.author游鳳芸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陸雲鳳zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChien-Chang Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeng-Yun Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYun-Feng Luen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T08:17:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-27T08:17:39Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn2219-5696en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6462/JCDPEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://sport.sa.nctu.edu.tw/?page_id=724en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/155635-
dc.description.abstract目的:探討2012年及2008年奧運女子桌球比賽的三段技術表現情形。方法:本研究以兩屆的單打金牌選手李曉霞、張怡寧選手為研究對象,蒐集決賽、半決賽及半準決賽的比賽做為研究範圍,以桌球比賽技術統計表格為研究工具,使用觀察方式並將各項資料以描述統計進統計分析。結果:一、李曉霞選手三段技術表現情形,在技術使用率最高是相持段,其次使用是發球搶攻段,最少使用的技術為接發球搶攻段,在得分上以相持段技術為主,其次得分是發球搶攻段,另外在得分較少為接發球搶攻段。二、張怡寧選手三段技術表現情形,在技術使用率最高是相持段,其次使用是發球搶攻段,最少使用的技術為接發球搶攻段,在得分上以發球搶攻段技術為主,其次得分是接發球搶攻段,另外在得分較少為相持段。三、兩位選手在三段技術使用率的順序是一樣,但在得分率不相同,李曉霞選手是以相持段最高,張怡寧選手則是發球搶攻段。結論:兩屆選手的使用技術順序皆為相同,但在得分的技術為不相同。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to discuss the technique performance in the match of women's single players in 2012 and 2008 Olympic Games. Method: In this study, two singles gold medalist Li Xiao-xia, Zhang Yi-ning athletes for the study. The collection finals, semi-finals and the semi-final match as the scope, table tennis game technology Statistics as a research tool, way of seeing and using the data to statistical analysis into descriptive statistics. Results: The results show: 1. Li Xiao-xia players three-stage technical performance situations, Usage is highest in the skill of stalemate, secondly, the use of serve and attack stage, least used as a receive and attack stage. The highest scoring rate was the skill of stalemate, then serve and attack stage and receive and attack stage. 2. Zhang Yi-ning players three-stage technical performance situations, Usage is highest in the skill of stalemate, secondly, the use of serve and attack stage, least used as a receive and attack stage. The highest scoring rate was serve and attack stage, then receive and attack stage and the skill of stalemate. 3. The two players use in the same order of three-stage technical, but the scoring rate is not the same, Li Xiao-xia players stalemate is the highest score. Zhang Yining players serve and attack stage is the highest score. Conclusion: Both technologies sequence are all the same, but scoring is not the same technology.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher國立交通大學體育室zh_TW
dc.publisherOffice of Physical Education National Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.subject奧運zh_TW
dc.subject技術分析zh_TW
dc.subject李曉霞zh_TW
dc.subject張怡寧zh_TW
dc.subjectOlympicen_US
dc.subjecttechnical analysisen_US
dc.subjectLi Xiao-xiaen_US
dc.subjectZhang Yi-ningen_US
dc.title奧運桌球女子三段技術之分析zh_TW
dc.titleAnalysis of Olympic Women’s Table Tennis of the Three-stage Technologyen_US
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6462/JCDPEen_US
dc.identifier.journal交大體育學刊zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Chiao Da Physical Educationen_US
dc.citation.issue11en_US
dc.citation.spage25en_US
dc.citation.epage32en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal of Chiao Da Physical Education