Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author林榮生en_US
dc.contributor.authorJung-Sheng Linen_US
dc.contributor.author孫春在en_US
dc.contributor.authorChuen-Tsai Sunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T01:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T01:30:27Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT009073514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/42558-
dc.description.abstract摘 要 人們在合作的互動中,交換彼此的意見,討論學習的心得,將會使學習更有效果,更有助於問題的解決。基於這個理念,本研究依照史坦伯格(Robert J .Sternberg)所創設的思考風格原則,從台北市兩所中等學校的八個班級學生樣本中,選出有效樣本共258位學生,區分為86組,進行小組的合作學習,藉此從事於思考風格組別、合作效能與集體效能對於解決電腦遊戲問題的相關研究,希望能獲得肯定的結果,藉以提供教學的參考。 實驗的結果有下列的發現:(1)高立法組解決一個單元之電腦遊戲問題所花時間最短,(2)除了高司法組外,依思考風格分組的其他各組的合作效能對於解決電腦遊戲問題達顯著負相關。各組的合作效能成效以高行政組為最佳,(3)各組的集體效能對解決電腦遊戲問題亦都能達到顯著負相關,尤其以三高組為最佳,且在回歸分析中都可得到回歸線(之回歸方程式。(4)整體有效樣本的學習態度對於解決遊戲問題的時間都具有高度顯著的相關,足以說明群體的學習態度在解決問題佔有很重要的關係,其中以解題的概念為最重要。(5)依據各項數據得以繪製對於解決遊戲問題時間的路徑圖。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT In the act of cooperative interaction, people will exchange their opinions and share their ideas on learning. It makes learning more efficient and helpful in solving problems. Based on the idea, this research follows the principles of thinking styles proposed by Robert J. Stemberg. 258 students were chosen as valid samples from 8 classes at two middle schools in Taipei, and divided into 86 groups to do cooperative learning. A series of experiments were performed to evaluate that how different thinking styles, the cooperative efficacy and the collective efficacy affect the performance of solving problems in computer games. We hereby hope to get useful information for tuitional reference. The experiments have the following results: (1) The superior legislate group spends least time solving an unit of problems in computer games. (2) Except for the superior judicial group, there is a negatively significant correlation between the cooperative efficacy and the time of solving problems in computer games for all the other groups. Among them, the superior executive group has the best cooperative efficacy. (3)The collective efficacy of each group also has the negatively significant correlation to the time of solving problems in computer games, specifically the all-superior group has the best performance. Therefore, each group can get the equation of each regression line through the simple regression analysis. (4)The learning attitude of all the valid samples have a significant correlation to the time of solving problems in games. It means that the collective learning attitude plays an important role in solving problems, especially the idea of how to solve the problems is most significant. (5)According to the results of the experiments, we draw the path diagrams for the time of solving problems in the games.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject電腦遊戲zh_TW
dc.subject合作學習zh_TW
dc.subject解決問題zh_TW
dc.subject思考風格zh_TW
dc.subjectComputer Gameen_US
dc.subjectCooperative Learingen_US
dc.subjectProblem Solvingen_US
dc.subjectThinking Stylesen_US
dc.title以遊戲為基礎的合作學習對解決問題的影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of Composing Different Cooperative Learning Groups on Problem Solving Performance and Cooperative Attitudesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department理學院科技與數位學習學程zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis