标题: | 作者与学术期刊对机构典藏态度之研究 A Study of the Attitudes of Authors and Academic Journal Publishers Toward Institutional Repositories |
作者: | 林美玲 Lin, Mei-Ling 柯皓仁 Ke, Hao-Ren 资讯学院数位图书资讯学程 |
关键字: | 机构典藏;SHERPA/RoMEO;Institutional Repository;SHERPA/RoMEO |
公开日期: | 2009 |
摘要: | 摘要 在网际网路的社会,数位化已成为一股潮流,相较于一般人惯常将自身的研究成果呈现在个人网页上,大学更有需要将其研究社群的学术研究成果加以整合,以数位化的型式做整体的呈现,机构典藏是目前最常用的方式之一。 本研究首先透过文献分析来了解机构典藏与大学之间的关系、机构典藏产生的效益、有效的推广模式等。其次以深度访谈法访谈国立清华大学10位教授,探究研究社群对机构典藏的理解和意见。由于学术期刊为机构典藏全文文献的重要来源,本研究继而以立意抽样的方式,问卷调查国内学术期刊,取得40份回收样本进行分析。归纳本研究结果有以下的发现: (1)机构典藏可成为大学提升学术能见度的助力。 (2)清华大学的研究社群对校内机构典藏的理解,可透过沟通来增强。 (3)厘清着作权议题对机构典藏的文献征集有正面的助益。 (4)国内学术期刊对机构典藏的授权参与有正面的意愿。 文献的质量是用来评估机构典藏是否成功的关键之一,在大学中研究社群及学术期刊对机构典藏是否有足够的理解与支持,是否愿意授权全文均为重要因素。根据本研究结果,提出以下4点建议: (1)以作者的行销建议与沟通,来改善机构典藏在大学中理解与参与度不高的问题。 (2)由上而下有效整合大学内学术研究成果,整体呈现在机构典藏以提升大学国际学术能见度。 (3)提供明确的着作权合理使用规范和政策,以改善大学研究社群与学术期刊提供全文的障碍。 (4)加强大学研究社群和学术期刊全文授权和参与意愿,有效提升文献征集的质量,以增强机构典藏在大学中运作效能,以此成为推升大学学术能见度的助力。 In the modern internet society, digitizing is now becoming a trend. Compared to the general public of displaying the papers on their personal website, Universities need to create a uniform platform for collecting, maintaining, preserving and presenting the research outcomes in a digitized manner. Building an Institutional Repository (IRs) is one feasible solution and is one of the most popularly used means Firstly, literature analysis is used to understand the relationship between IRs and the University; the benefits derived from the use of IRs; and the effective promotional method. Secondly, in-depth interview method is used to interview ten professors, exploring their understanding and suggestions toward the IRs. Questionnaires were collected from forty randomly selected academic journal publishers, investigating their attitude toward the IRs. According to the research results, the findings are: (1) The IRs could bring benefits for the University’s academic visibility. (2) To develop the attitude and realization of the researchers toward the use of IRs in the University thorugh the communication. (3) To sort out the subject of intellectual property have positive benefits toward the IR’s documents collection. (4) The academic journal publishers in Taiwan have positive attitude toward the IRs. The way to evaluate the intellectual of the IRs is the quantity of research documents in the system. The literary property right of these documents is the key factor to whether the University researchers or the academic journal publishers have sufficient understanding and support to the IRs. According to the research conclusions, here are the suggestions: (1) Use author’s marketing suggestion and communication to improve and enhance the researchers’ understanding and participation in the IRs. (2) Effectively integrate the intellectual output from top to bottom. Ensemble presentation in the IRs to increase the University’s international academic visibility. (3) To offer a decided policy of intellectual property and its regulations in order to improve the researcher and academic journal publishers’ willingness to provide research documents. (4) To reinforce the author and the academic journal publishers’ willingness to authorize and participate, which will effectively increase the deposit number of papers in the IRs. In this way, it will strengthen the operation of IRs in the University and support in the promotion of the University’s academic visibility. |
URI: | http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079779546 http://hdl.handle.net/11536/46537 |
显示于类别: | Thesis |
文件中的档案:
If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.