标题: 轨道运输系统安全管理检核评估之研究—以台北捷运公司为例
Developing a Checking and Evaluating System for Railway Safety Management—A Case Study for Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation
作者: 吴晋光
Jinn-Guang Wu
张新立
Hsin-Li Chang
运输与物流管理学系
关键字: 轨道运输;系统安全;安全管理;捷运;railway;system safety;safety management;mass rapid transit
公开日期: 2000
摘要: 目前各大都会区均以轨道大众运输为主要发展方向,且其安全亦渐受重视。然而轨道运输之规模庞大、条件复杂、作业项目繁多,其安全管理所牵扯之层面极为广泛,因此,若无系统化之监督与管理,其安全管理恐难完善。有鉴于此,本研究乃藉助系统安全之“事故预防安全管理分析概念”,探讨台北捷运系统各层面在事故预防及安全管理上所面临之课题及所应积极推动之工作。
本研究首先回顾国内外轨道运输安全及风险评估之相关文献,并对轨道运输安全及安全管理进行系统化分析,继而配合轨道运输系统之生命周期,从规划、兴建、营运、维修至淘汰,建立轨道运输系统各阶段之安全管理要项,包括系统安全规划、系统安全设计、系统安全兴建、运转安全管理、工作环境安全管理、员工安全训练管理、维修安全管理、紧急事故预防处理、监督检核管理等。其次,透过捷运公司各类员工之团体焦点讨论(focus group),发掘捷运安全之盲点及潜在危险因素,并将所提及之概念归纳为乘客、设备材料、外在环境、公司管理方式及政策、经验及教导方式、维修技术、设备设计、整体系统问题、员工个人特性、备品采购、部门介面沟通、监督、标示、保养检查、规范/程序/规章、工程技术、兴建承包商、兴建/营运单位、工作环境等19个因素,及内外在环境构面、设备因素构面、公司管理制度构面及员工特性构面等四大构面。
本研究利用讨论所得之概念研拟捷运安全管理检核题目,并请专家学者评鉴该题目是否适当,进而建立台北捷运安全管理之检核表。再由捷运公司员工填答该检核表,以求得各危险因素问项之量化指标。危险因素之风险评估包含检核表评估及危险性综合评估,并建立各项危险因素之危害、影响及严重度分析表。最后,利用变异数检定方法,分析不同阶层、部门、年资及有无事故处理经验的员工,评估各种危险因素之发生频率程度及发生后严重程度有无差异。
研究结果显示“月台上乘客过多,发生人潮推挤情形”之发生频率为最高;“民众卧轨自杀事件被媒体报导出来后,造成其他民众仿效卧轨自杀。”若发生时其严重度将最高。透过危险性综合评估,以“月台上乘客过多,发生人潮推挤情形。”之危险程度为最高。本研究建议实务界应逐步建立轨道运输安全定期自动查核评估作业,并制订相关检查标准与表格;针对轨道安全之危害分析及风险评估相关研究做更深入探讨,建立完整之轨道运输系统安全研究资料。
Checking and evaluating is becoming increasingly important popular as a means of preventing workplace accidents and near accidents for safety management. Safety is the top priority in railway operation and depends on its safety management. This study tries to apply the accident preventing method of system safety for Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (TRTC).
The first task of this study is to determine the contents of safety management for a railway system, which are required to assure the safety for a specified railway system during any phase of its lifecycle. A completed railway system safety management, as a minimum, should include the following activities: system safety planning, system safety designing, system safety constructing, operating safety management, workplace safety management, staff safety training management, maintenance safety management, methods of preventing critical accidents, supervision and checking management.
The focus group method is applied to TRTC staffs to identify the salient Railway Problem Factors (RPF) of safety management for the railway system. Compiling TRTC staff’s discussion results, full agreement was reached on 19 RPF’s. These 19 RPF’s enabled the construction of a “Draft TRTC Safety Checklist”. This draft checklist was revised and became the “TRTC Safety Checklist” after the review taken by rail professionals and experts.
Risk assessment of railway safety management includes the checklist evaluation and criticality analysis. The empirical study results showed the crowded passengers on the platform is the most dangerous situation for TRTC operation. Furthermore, different staff groups, in terms of departments, working years, and accident experience, were found to evaluate different probabilities and severities for the same RPF.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#NT890423011
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/67059
显示于类别:Thesis