完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author鄭冰兒en_US
dc.contributor.authorPing-Erh Chengen_US
dc.contributor.author孫春在en_US
dc.contributor.authorChuen-Tsai Sunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T02:51:08Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T02:51:08Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT009273526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/77906-
dc.description.abstract合作學習是近些年來受到重視的教學策略,影響合作成效的因素相當多,本篇論文針對任務指派與思考風格二個主軸探討合作學習策略。 為探討不同思考風格小組在任務指派與不指派下的學習成效,將實驗過程分為二個階段,利用線上問卷調查,取得學生本身的思考風格,分為同質組、異質組、中低風格組,利用學習單、評分表、問卷,取得學生在群組活動的資料;將任務切割為獨立的子任務,每一成員負責任務的一部分,如此,我們可以觀察老師指派任務(實驗組),與老師不指派任務,由學生自行協調任務(對照組)在不同思考風格群組下的學習成效。 本研究成果統整如下: 一、任務不指派的中低風格組集體效能後測大於前測。 二、任務指派的同質組合作滿意度觀感優於任務不指派。 三、任務不指派的異質組合作滿意度優於任務指派。 四、任務不指派的各組小組成績優於任務指派。 透過量的分析與質的研究,我們統整出高中生最佳的分組模式為任務不指派的異質組提供教師於於教學活動中合作分組的參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTeam–based cooperative learning has become an important learning method in the past few decades. Many factors of learning effect have been discussed. In this study, we aim at the assignment and the thinking styles of team members in the cooperative learning. To thoroughly investigate the assignment effects on different thinking-style groups, this study divided the experiment into two stages. Using network questionnaire, we collect student’ thinking styles. Dividing into homogeneous group, heterogeneous group, and middle-low style group. Using the learning sheet, the evaluation sheet, and the questionnaires, we obtain information on students’ group activities. According to the thesis of cooperation, we divided the task into several tasks. Each member of the group has his own tasks. We could observe the assignment and the non-assignment of the group learning achievement in different thinking-style group. In this study, the conclusions are as follows: 1. The post-test group efficacy of the non-assignment in the middle-low style group is better than pretest. 2. The group satisfaction perspective of the assignment in the homogeneous group is better than the non-assignment. 3. The group satisfaction of the non-assignment in the heterogeneous group is better than the assignment. 4. The achievement in each group in the non-assignment is better than assignment. Through quantitative study and qualitative research, we induced and obtained the optimal grouping model for senior high school students is the hetero-grouped team of the non-assignment. It can provide teachers’ future reference in designing a teaching activity.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject合作學習zh_TW
dc.subject思考風格zh_TW
dc.subject任務指派zh_TW
dc.subject集體效能zh_TW
dc.subject同質組zh_TW
dc.subject異質組zh_TW
dc.subjectcooperative learningen_US
dc.subjectthinking styleen_US
dc.subjectassignmenten_US
dc.subjectgroup efficacyen_US
dc.subjecthomogeneous groupen_US
dc.subjectheterogeneous groupen_US
dc.title任務指派對於小組思考風格影響之研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe study of assignment effects on different thinking-style groupsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department理學院科技與數位學習學程zh_TW
顯示於類別:畢業論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 352601.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。