1. You are Here：

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jennifer Shu-Jenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChou, Shuo-Yanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChouhuang, Wayne T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, C. P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:12:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:12:35Z-
dc.date.issued2008-02-16en_US
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.043en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/9666-
dc.description.abstractThe paper of Finan and Hurley - published in Computers and Operations Research (2002) - was re-examined, where they discussed a seemingly contradictory phenomenon resulting from the ignoring of wash criteria in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). With that, they raised a serious challenge to the AHP methodology. However, by reviewing their arguments and example data, analyses regarding to their propositions and numerical example are presented in this paper to counter their challenge. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectdecision analysisen_US
dc.subjectanalytic hierarchy process (AHP)en_US
dc.subjectrank reversalen_US
dc.subjectwash criterionen_US
dc.titleNote on "Wash criterion in analytic hierarchy process"en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.043en_US
dc.identifier.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume185en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage444en_US
dc.citation.epage447en_US
dc.contributor.department科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Management of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000250258400029-
dc.citation.woscount2-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000250258400029.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.

Related Contents
Loading...