标题: | 以微机电制程制作微型PDMS质子交换膜燃料电池之实验研究 The Experimental Study on Micro PDMS PEMFC by Using MEMS Technology |
作者: | 许义嘉 Hsu, Yi-Ja 陈俊勋 Chen, Chiun-Hsun 机械工程学系 |
关键字: | 微机电;PDMS;微型质子交换膜燃料电池;开孔率;锁合压力;MEMS;PDMS;Micro PEMFC;Open Ratio;lamping Force |
公开日期: | 2009 |
摘要: | 本文主要为研究以微机电制程制作微型PDMS质子交换膜燃料电池之实验测试。探讨反应面积为2公分×2公分的单电池。第一部分是PDMS(聚二甲基矽氧烷)单电池之研究,实验参数包括集电片开孔形状、对流方式、以及组装时锁合扭力的影响;第二部分是PDMS平板电池堆的研究,实验参数包括锁合扭力以及燃料供应方式的影响;另外,单电池及电池堆都经由长时间放电测试以观察其耐久度。最后,本论文也将PDMS微型燃料电池与矽微型燃料电池做性能的比较与分析。 由实验结果可知在相同开孔率之集电片下,不论阴极采用呼吸式或是强制对流式 (有流场板)之单电池,其性能皆随集电片之开孔数增加而提升;强制对流方式的单电池比较适合高电流密度输出使用,而呼吸式燃料电池较适合低电流长时间输出使用;电池组装之锁合压力必须在不使流道结构变型的情况下增加才能有效提升其性能;对于本实验之电池堆设计,由于阴极端的空气提供速率有限,因此增加燃料流量并无法有效改善浓度极化现象;另外,电池堆中之每颗单电池因为燃料供应顺序不同而会有不同性能表现;单电池与电池堆经过十四小时长时间测试后,都有良好的耐久度;经比较后,不论阴极采用呼吸式或是强制对流式,PDMS基材之单电池皆比矽基材之单电池性能表现佳;由于PDMS基材有比较少的积水现象,因此比矽基材更适合用在呼吸式微型燃料电池上。 This study fabricated micro PDMS (Polydimethyl Siloxane) PEMFC (Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell) by using the MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) technology. The active area of the membrane is 2cm×2cm. Firstly, a series of performance experiments on a single micro PDMS PEMFC was carried out. The experimental parameters included current collector shape, convection type and clamping force, respectively. Secondly, a planar PEMFC stack was designed and assembled to test the performance. The experimental parameters consisted of clamping force and fuel supply condition. In addition, both the single cell and the stack were tested for durability. Finally, a comparison between PDMS-based PEMFC and silicon-based one was made. The experimental results show that both the performances of the air-breathing and forced convection cells increase with an increase of the circle numbers from one to twenty-five on the current collector under the same current collector open ratio; The forced convection cell is a better choice for long-time high current-density output whereas the air-breathing cell is more suitable for lower current density output; An appropriate clamping torque should be considered carefully to enhance the performance but without narrowing down the fuel flow channels; The increase of flow rate is not a best way to improve the concentration loss in this air-breathing stack experiment because of the limiting air supply, and each cell in the same stack has different performance under series arrangement; Both the single micro PDMS fuel cell and the cell stack can maintain a stable power output for a long time use up to 14 hours; The PDMS-based PEMFC has a better performance than that of the silicon-based one under both forced oxygen supply and the air-breathing ways; PDMS is a better material than silicon for micro air-breathing fuel cell because it is with less water flooding effects. |
URI: | http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079714542 http://hdl.handle.net/11536/44701 |
显示于类别: | Thesis |
文件中的档案:
If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.