同儕思考風格相似程度對互評與自我覺察的影響

Abstract

本研究主軸是以「鏡中自我」為理論基礎，探討相似風格的同儕是否為幫助自我覺察較佳的鏡子。 本研究以同儕互評為鏡子，探討同儕的特殊性是否會影響其反映出的鏡像呢?是否具有相同思考風格的同儕較能真實的發現被評者的思考風格呢?本研究想要進一步探討，鏡子的特性是否與察覺效能有關? 什麼風格較適合用何種鏡子來反映? 研究結果如下：(1)利用同儕思考風格的相似度來做為選取這面鏡子的篩選標準是可行的。(2)當群內成員風格較不明顯，其立法風格尤其容易被相似的同儕所覺察。另外，本研究還發現女生的立法風格特質的表現比男生更為突出，也更容易被覺察。（3）司法單高的人，他的三種風格特質都非常容易讓相近的同儕所覺察。（4）群的組合成員若是司法風格值較高是有助於立法風格與行政風格互評的一致性。（5）在經過互評過程以及相似同儕互評分數回饋後，對本來屬於中低風格的施測者的思考風格會產生影響。

The research is based on the theory “Looking Glass-self” to discuss whether the peers with similar thinking styles form a better glass to help self-awareness. In this research, peer-assessment plays the role of the looking glass, which is used to explore whether the properties of peers have any effect on their reflection as a mirror and whether peers with the same thinking styles are more likely to find out the thinking styles of those who are evaluated. We then further investigate the relationship between the characteristics of the mirror and the efficiency of awareness, or which mirror is suitable for a certain style in terms of awareness. The conclusions include: First, it’s workable to use the similarities of thinking styles among peers as an indicator of choosing a proper mirror. Second, the legislative thinking style is much easier to sense by similar peers when the members of the group reveal no particularly obvious styles. Besides, we observe that the legislative styles of the female are more remarkable than those of the male, and easier to be sensed. Third, all three styles of those who with higher judicial thinking styles are easier to sense by similar peers. Fourth, it helps the compatibility of cross-evaluation of legislative and executive styles when the group members have higher judicial thinking styles. Finally, after the procedure of cross-evaluating and the feedback of grades made by peers who make cross-evaluation, there is an influence on the thinking styles of those whose thinking styles are originally in the middle or low rank.