标题: | 台湾与南韩晶圆代工竞争力分析: 以个案公司为例 The competitive analysis of foundry business between Taiwan and South Korea: cases study |
作者: | 丁友贞 Ting, Yu-Chen 钟惠民 任维廉 Chung, Huimin Jen, William 管理学院高阶主管管理硕士学程 |
关键字: | 半导体产业;晶圆代工;摩尔定律;竞争策略;Semiconductor Industry;Competitive Strategy;Foundry;IDM;;Moore's Law;IC |
公开日期: | 2012 |
摘要: | 一向被台湾厂商视为劲敌的南韩,近来年电子相关产业发展得愈来愈好,尤其是三星集团旗下的三星电子,一手包办手机、电视、记忆体及面板等产品的国际龙头地位,高度垂直整合的商业模式,加上从终端产品的发展角度来布局整个企业攻城掠地的策略,让世界各国都不敢轻忽南韩三星的一举一动。三星文化中一向存在着高度的危机意识,总是寻找着企业下一波成长的契机,为此于2010 年宣布进军晶圆代工服务产业,进军理由着重于晶圆代工的的高毛利率及三星自有产品的需求,过去帮苹果公司代工行动处理器的经验,让三星晶圆代工的成绩由第九名跃升至全球的第三名,而且逼进第二名的格罗方德,当然一向非做到第一不可的三星,对晶圆代工的野心绝非如此,他要竞争的对象非常清楚,那就是晶圆代工产业的龙头老大,拥有近半市占率、毛利率高达五成的台积电,台积电一向是国内企业的模范生,面对台湾众多公司败阵于三星的情况下,众人莫不盼望台积电能打赢这场仗,然而面对迥异于过去单纯晶圆代工业者的新竞争,台积电该拿出什么因应策略?三星又会有什么新的策略?这些将是本研究试图分析的对象,藉由两个个案公司过去及现在的策略研究,来推论未来可能的策略并提出建议,以为相关业界之参考。 研究发现台积电目前仍较具竞争优势,因为其在晶圆代工产业中的经济规模及较强的客户信任基础,然而,先进技术制程一向是台积电获利的利基来源,若要延续摩尔定律的时限,必需投入愈来愈高额的资本资出,虽说台积电的财务状况良好,但面对此一长期战争,即早准备粮草或许是台积电最需要努力的重点之一;反观三星,因苹果公司离开所造成的产能空缺,短期之内可能由自家产品弥补,长期发展还是需要外部客户,在寻找客户的过程中,能否以其终端产品为名,行带动晶圆代工订单之实?抑或客户担忧自己成为下一个索尼、苹果,拒绝下单至三星?这些都考验着未来三星在晶圆代工业务的发展方向。 据台积电董事长张忠谋先生预估,2013年晶圆代工将有10% 以上的成长率,由于行动装置产品的热卖,造成 PC 市场的萎缩,英特尔也开始宣布进军晶圆代工服务,并抢走台积电大客户阿尔特拉(Altera),这些拥有主力产品的IDM大厂开始加入竞争行列, 再加上格罗方德(Globalfoundries)、联电等二线业者在后追赶,台积电的压力可谓不小,不过,诚如张董事长所言,现在的台积电只能抱着必胜的决心,一步一步谨慎地面对新挑战,再次迎接下一个新的里程碑。 South Korea is always treated as the strong competitor by Taiwan electronic industries, especially for Samsung Group, till today, Samsung electronics has gotten the international leading position in different products, including smart phones, TV, memory and panel etc., no one in the world would disregard his any movement. Samsung’s great competitive ability mainly is from the vertical and integrated business model, plus overall perspectives strategy from end products to components. To have highly sense of crisis is Samsung’s traditional culture, he is always seeking new business for next wave development opportunities, in Y2010, he announced to start the foundry business which has high profit margin and high growth rate in the future. From the experience to work for Apple mobile processors, his foundry business revenue is growing fast, now is the worldwide no.3 company, and has a very little gap to Global Foundries, who is the no.2 foundry company. Of course, as the Samsung’s expectation, to be the no.1 is his target, that is, the major competitor he focused is TSMC who is the foundry leader with near 50% market share and gross margin. TSMC is always the leading company among Taiwan enterprises. To face more and more domestic industries to lose business due to the competition with Samsung, all Taiwanese start to expect TSMC is able to win the battle. However, faced with the new competition is quite different from the pure foundry industry, TSMC will come up with what the coping strategies? Samsung have any new strategy? This study attempts to analyze the two companies their past and current strategies, finally make recommendation to future actions for industry reference. The study found that TSMC is still a competitive advantage because of economies of scale in the foundry industry and strong customer trust, advanced technology process, however, has always been the major TSMC profitable niche source, to the continuation of Moore's Law, it is necessary to have higher capital assets investments, although TSMC's financial position seems sound, but for long-term consideration, to prepare more resources and have much stronger financial plan maybe is the most important strategy for TSMC to go next phase. The other hand, to Samsung, his own product may cover the capacity shortage issue when Apple leaves in the short term, however, he must need other customers for his foundry business in the long-term development. How to build up the “trust” with customers who maybe are his competitors at the same time is the big challenge to Samsung. TSMC chairman Morris Chang estimated that in 2013 the foundry will have a growth rate of more than 10%. Due to the hot selling of different mobile device products, PC market is shrinking and makes Intel also announced its entry into foundry services, soon snatched TSMC customer Altera, with more and more IDM companies began to join in the competition, and plus the tightly catch up by second-line foundries, ex. Global foundries and UMC, TSMC will face more and more pressure than before, however, just same as Morris said, now tsmc can do is to hold the determination to win, then step by step to face new challenges, who knows it may be another new wonderful milestone. |
URI: | http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT070063001 http://hdl.handle.net/11536/71505 |
显示于类别: | Thesis |